As I previously reported Microsoft System Management Server 2003 will gain, starting from SP1, the possibility to control and administer Virtual Server 2005 and Virtual PC 2004.
So many of you could be interested in partecipating this beta. If so go at homepage program and apply for the program.
Year: 2004
Microsoft delays Virtual PC 7 for Mac
Quoting whole article from The Mac Observer:
The Macintosh Business Unit (Mac BU) of Microsoft Corp. has confirmed the release of Virtual PC 7.0, Microsoft’s PC emulation software, has been delayed from the first half of this year until the second half of 2004 due to longer-than-expected development and testing, a company spokeswoman said.
“Virtual PC for Mac Version 7 will be available in the second half of 2004,” Jessica Sommer, Product Manager for the Mac BU, told The Mac Observer, Tuesday. Sommer would not be more specific on a time frame or month.
In explaining the delay, Sommer said, “This is the first version of Virtual PC for Mac developed by Microsoft. Initially, our development and testing timeline was estimated based on our experience with development of Office. The developing, testing, and bug fix cycle with Virtual PC is longer than that of Office and the testing more vigorous than previous versions of Virtual PC. Because of this, we have adjusted our release timing to match a more realistic schedule.”
In addition, there is an edition of Virtual PC 7 that ships with Windows XP in a box by itself, as well as Windows XP being included in the Office 2004 Professional Edition,” she commented. “We are waiting for the release of Windows XP SP2 in order to offer the most recent, most secure version of Windows XP to our Virtual PC for Mac customers. Windows XP SP2 release has moved to the end of July which has impacted our schedule as well.”
Sommer would not confirm the amount of manpower that is working on completing Virtual PC 7.0 for release. “There are 165 people in the Mac BU some are focused on Office, some on VPC, some on MSN Messenger,” Sommer said.
The company announced at Macworld Expo last January that it planned on releasing Microsoft Office 2004 Standard Edition, Office 2004 Student and Teacher Edition, Virtual PC 7.0 and its associated Office 2004 Professional Edition in the first half of 2004, targeting the month of May.
With the delay in finishing and releasing Virtual PC 7.0, Sommer confirmed to TMO the decision was made to go ahead and ship Microsoft Office 2004 Standard Edition and Office 2004 Student and Teacher Edition now and not to delay customers from purchasing the product. Customers waiting on the new Office upgrade began receiving notification their orders were being shipped beginning today, as earlier reported by TMO, and many customers were able to buy the products at Apple’s retail stores as well beginning Tuesday.
Office 2004 is a bundled suite made up of Word 2004, PowerPoint 2004, Excel 2004, Entourage 2004 and MSN Messenger Version 4.0. Office 2004 for Mac Professional Edition is the same offering as the Standard Edition, but includes Virtual PC 7.0 with Windows XP Professional.
Virtual PC enables Mac users to emulate the operating characteristics of a Windows-based PC, providing Mac users with a way to run software that won’t run natively on their Macs. Few details of Virtual PC 7.0’s enhancements have been divulged, but Microsoft had previously confirmed it would be compatible with Apple’s Power Mac G5 systems.
Really seems Connectix virtualization technologies are much harder to manage and develope than what expected at acquisition time…
VMware releases HyperThreading whitepaper
As you know the new ESX Server 2.1.0 introduces HyperThreading support, improving virtual environment up to 30% according with Intel official benchmarks.
Before ESX 2.1 release many users asked in newsgroups and web forums informations about how HT impacts on virtual machines performances, and many skilled users on computer architectures or kernel development tried to answer the important question.
Now, some weeks after ESX release, VMware releases an interesting paper about HT. A must read, for all VMware customers.
Go on and read it here!
MacOS goes virtual (well, not exactly)
Yes, everybody knows virtualization technologies can’t help when you want to run a MacOS over a common x86 architecture. This is because MacOS runs on PowerPC architecture and server virtualization don’t aim to emulate different hardware. Anyway have a MacOS in a box won’t hurt…
Now we can try the Apple experience on Linux or Windows systems thanks to PearPC project, which has just released its first public version (0.1).
So go on and give it a try but remember: emulation is much slower than virtualization, so don’t expect great performances.
VMware adheres a new Server Virtualization program
Quoting from Business Wire:
Topspin Communications, the leader in switched computing, today announced the formation of a VFrame(TM) Developers Program intended to foster the delivery, documentation, and testing of integrated solutions for server virtualization. Many industry-leading software partners have already joined the program, including Opsware, Oracle, Platform Computing, Qlusters and VMware. Others are invited to join as well.
Topspin provides the industry’s first programmable server switch, a new category of data center infrastructure designed to provide an intelligent backbone for grid, or on-demand, or utility computing. Topspin’s new VFrame server virtualization software suite allows provisioning intelligence to be programmed into the server switch hardware by industry-leading management and provisioning tools using VFrame APIs and a software developer kit (SDK).
“We are excited to have such a solid list of partners to kick-off this program,” said Ben Eiref, director business development at Topspin. “The greatest strength of VFrame is that it offers the first truly open solution for switch-based utility computing. We allow our customers to choose their preferred servers, storage, applications, and management tools and connect it all seamlessly through the server switch. With our VFrame development partners we can offer our customers a wide range of quality solutions.”
Opsware
“Customers want best of breed utility computing solutions that don’t lock them in to a single vendor,” said Tim Howes, CTO and EVP of development for Opsware Inc. “DCML, a developing open standard for utility computing, enables this multi-vendor vision. Opsware is looking forward to working with Topspin’s VFrame, using DCML to further automate the IT lifecycle and deliver utility computing.”
Oracle
“Topspin’s VFrame interface provides a useful way to implement server virtualization and provisioning policies through a single InfiniBand switch interface and we’re looking at how to take advantage of this with Oracle’s Grid Computing technology,” said Benny Souder, vice president of Distributed Database Development, Oracle Corporation. “I’m also pleased to see Topspin’s timely launch of this capability as it coincides with the creation of the Enterprise Grid Alliance, where the technology will link together best of breed grid building blocks.”
Platform Computing
“Customers are asking for a better way to flexibly share server, storage, and application resources,” said Robert Boettcher, vice president of Financial Services at Platform Computing. “Topspin helps provide the ability to virtualize the server infrastructure underneath the grid application services. Together, Topspin and Platform can provide a complete turnkey solution for data center managers who want to build their own grid infrastructure.”
Qlusters
“Working through Topspin’s VFrame server switch interface, Qlusters SSI single system image technology enables customers to achieve the scalability of traditional SMP systems running on much less expensive commodity clusters,” said Moshe Bar, CTO of Qlusters. “We’re pleased to see Topspin creating this developer program since we have common customers asking to have our two products running together.”
VMware
“VMware, the leader in virtual infrastructure software for x86-based systems, sees the potential of fabric-based technologies such as Topspin to bring additional I/O consolidation, performance and cost-containment benefits for customers as they deploy their VMware virtualization solutions,” said Brian Byun, senior director of Alliances, VMware. “We are pleased to be charter members of the VFrame developer program.”
More information on the VFrame Developers Program can be found at: http://www.topspin.com/partners/vframedevprog.html
Red Hat will embed VMware in a new desktop OS
At first it was Red Hat Linux (till version 10).
Then Red Hat prefered to move towards a totally commercial way shutting down RHL distribution (and only offering Red Hat Enteprise Linux).
Meanwhile it sponsored a volunteers evolution of RHL: Fedora distribution.
Now Red Hat changed its mind again and announces Red Hat Desktop Linux, which is a commercial distribution.
Apart all these evolutions, what is really interesting is that RH is going to include VMware Workstation inside this new distribution.
RH decided this move to simplify users migration from Windows systems to Linux ones, thinking the same way Microsoft did when acquired Connectix: Red Hat hopes Linux users will run their not-yet-ported Windows applications inside VMware, Microsoft hopes Windows users will run their legacy applications inside Virtual Server.
Microsoft Virtual Server will be 64-bit capable, but not now
The upcoming Virtual Server 2005 will not be 64-bit capable, remaining behind VMware offers, expected to launch 64-bit products line in next months.
But Jim Livingston, Microsoft Program Manager for Windows Servers architecture team, said at WinHEC conference, MVS will be 64-bit capable in the future, able to run 32 and 64-bit virtual machines.
EMC Corporation answer: why VMware acquisition?
EMC Corp. President and CEO, Joe Tucci finally answer the great question.
Quoting from CRN:
…
CRN: Why VMware? What was the rationale behind the acquisition of VMware?
Tucci: I think, basically, and everybody uses this word, utility computing. A lot of [utility computing is] around how you virtualize your storage, your network, and your server assets. Over time, it’s clear to me that, at least for storage and servers, that these decisions have to be very coordinated. This technology has to work together. And when you look around at who had the best virtualization software out there, it was clear to me for servers it was VMware. For storage, it was EMC.
This is tricky now, but I’m dedicated to it, and it’s important to your reader base, in the case of VMware I’m absolutely dedicated to let our server partners use that same technology, even if it competes against me.
So IBM is free to take VMware server virtualization technology and combine it with their storage virtualization technology and have a competing offering. That’s part of the rules of being open. But I will certainly look for offerings to do that myself, also.
CRN: If that’s the case, then why acquire VMware? If it’s something that’s going to be completely open, what’s the advantage to EMC?
Tucci: We’ll make money on it. We told the world that VMware did slightly less than $100 million last year, and we said that we could double that. In the first quarter, it did $39 million in revenue, which led everybody to say, ‘Yeah, I guess they can do that.’ A $200 million software business is a pretty valuable commodity. It broadens our horizons.
Umm…Tucci really seems don’t know what to do with VMware technologies at today…
IBM will play the virtualization game
Quoting whole article from Computer World:
IBM today is announcing plans to begin offering new virtualization software and partitioning technology with its servers that will allow them to run as many as 10 versions of an operating system on a single processor.
IBM will add operating system enhancements — job scheduling and workload management capabilities, for example — along with software from its WebSphere, Tivoli and DB2 products to create a series of technologies and services it is calling Virtualization Engine.
This kind of technology has been available to IBM’s mainframe users for years. Virtualization Engine is the result of a three-year program to bring these capabilities to other IBM systems including storage devices, according to Tom Hawk, the general manager of IBM’s enterprise storage group.
It will increase the utilization levels of systems and make them easier to manage, he said. “What we’re really talking about is what I’ll call ‘mainframe-level manageability, discipline and tools,'” he said.
Virtualization Engine will be worked into IBM systems, starting with the iSeries line, which is expected to be refreshed within the next two months.
IBM plans to use technology it has developed internally to enable the partitioning of the Power5 processors, which are used in its iSeries and pSeries servers. The company will use an unnamed third party to deliver partitioning services to its Intel-based xSeries systems, it said.
IBM’s iSeries minicomputer line, formerly known as AS/400, already has a number of useful virtualization capabilities built in, according to Nigel Fortlage, the vice president of GH Young International, an international trade consulting firm based in Winnipeg, Manitoba.
In 2003, GH Young consolidated 16 Intel Corp. servers onto two iSeries machines running Linux, Windows 2000, and the OS/400 operating system that ships with iSeries servers. This saved the company $74,000 in hardware acquisition and maintenance costs, according to Fortlage.
“Prior to doing all of this virtualization, we were spending 95% of our time managing,” said Fortlage. “The iSeries manages so much of the low-level stuff that used to cause the glitches. I don’t have to do the three-finger salute every couple of days; they just run.” He said, referring to the Ctrl-Alt-Delete keyboard combination sometimes required to reboot Windows.
The Virtualization Engine components new to the iSeries will include an embedded version of Tivoli’s Provisioning Manager software, as well as a WebSphere-based grid computing tool kit that will allow customers to run distributed applications using the Open Grid Services Architecture standards.
The partitioning component of Virtualization Engine is similar to VMware Inc.’s GSX Server and ESX Server software and Hewlett-Packard Co.’s Virtual Partitions, Jonathan Eunice, an analyst at Illuminata Inc. in Nashua, N.H., said in an e-mail interview. “VMware does not allow individual applications to use more than two CPUs’ worth of performance. Power partitions scale far higher than VMware can,” Eunice wrote.
IBM, like HP and Sun Microsystems Inc., has done “pretty good” work with its virtualization technology so far, Eunice wrote. “The battle, however, is not just to do pretty good, but to do exceptional virtualization, to make it systematic, and to push its use throughout all the data center and IT processes,” he said. “No vendor and no user is … there yet.”
This is very interesting: IBM promoted VMware technologies so much till today, but it’s probably because wanted to simplify its virtualization technology entry. Now that customers see evident VMware benefits, it’s difficult they don’t look at a technology promising much better performances than VMware.
EMC Corporation moving to incorporate VMware technology in storage boxes
Quoting from Computer World:
…
Lewis also said EMC eventually plans to sell a single information life-cycle management (ILM) product that will handle the storage of data from creation to deletion on various types of storage, based on automated policies. That process, however, will take years, he said.
…
In addition, David Donatelli, executive vice president of storage platform operations at EMC, said the company is developing “ILM in a box,” which will use policy-based software and a mix of high-performance and low-end disk drives in the same enclosure to offer tiers of storage.
Donatelli emphasized that VMware’s virtualization software would eventually be incorporated into EMC’s platforms to allow software upgrades to be performed without affecting applications using storage boxes. “This is a mandate we have for all of our products,” he said.