History

At a point in time between May and June Microsoft has released the first version of a new specification called Application Virtualization (App-V) Volume Format.

The 31-pages still-unreleased document, published by Ruben Spruijt of Project Virtual Reality Check (VRC) fame, describes in details the file based file-system used by App-V containers, giving enough details to support it in 3rd party commercial and free applications.

Microsoft already published another App-V specification dedicated to the file format in February.

Now that Citrix is getting more serious market traction, with increased market share for its hypervisor, renewed recognition from analysis firms and additional capability to beat the market leader on time, its aggressiveness is increasing too.

Last week the company focused on the VMware | Cisco | EMC alliance dubbed VCE Coalition.

Scott Swanburg, Director of Service Provider and Cloud Computing, writes on the corporate blog:

…They call it VSphere for Cloud implementations and now VBlock for Enterprise.  Take a datacenter and virtualize the servers.  Take the storage arrays and provide management utilities.  Drop some routers and VoIP controllers into the mix and there you have it… a complete virtualization system… or a completely backwards way of providing a usable architecture for client side virtualization.  Oh yeah… after you do all of this, then all you have to do is bolt on a few thousand Virtual Machines for the users and everybody will be happy.  How preposterous!

Read more

Bernd Harzog, founder and CEO of APMExperts.com, recently published an interesting article about the role of Configuration Management Databases (CMDBs) in a world of virtualization and cloud computing. Or better: on the role that the four big infrastructure management vendors (BMC, CA, HP and IBM) may have in that world because of their CMDB solutions.

His point is that the use of CMDBs in virtual and cloud infrastructures has a number of challenges that can’t be addressed by existing solutions:

1. A whole new class of data gets created by the virtualization platform – specifically how the virtualization platform itself is configured in support of the guests and the applications that run on the guest.
2. A whole new set of relationships between the elements in this data get created – specifically new relationships between hosts, hypervisors, guests, virtual networks and virtual storage get created that existing CMDB’s were not built to handle.

Read more

Kevin Goodman, Senior Systems Engineer at Odyssey Logistics, is running an interesting technical blog titled Colocation to Virtualization where he’s reporting about the experience with the Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) blade platform, EMC storage and VMware vSphere 4.0.

He recently shared some interesting numbers about the consolidation ratio he’s achieving with such system (a UCS B200-M1):

…There are a total of 7 blades in our VMware environment, but only 5 of those are dedicated to our main HA/DRS cluster. That gives us ~240 gigs of RAM for the main cluster. Currently, I am seeing a VM consolidation ratio of about 24 VMs (virtual machines) per B200-M1 blade. The limitation here is definitely the RAM. The CPU itself is less than 25% utilized per blade…

Read more

Just a couple of weeks after the release of VirtualBox 3.2, Oracle publishes an update, moving its hosted virtualization platform to version 3.2.2.

This is a maintenance release, introducing just bug fixes.

In July 2009 VKernel released the betas of three new monitoring tools called Wastefinder, Rightsizer and Inventory.

Wastefinder is able to recognize the resources (storage, memory and CPU) wasted by inactive virtual machines, Rightsizer can recommend how to change the VMs virtual hardware according to their usage over time, and Inventory tracks the provision of new VMs, generating a report about the status of the inventory.

The three tools are being sold since then as a single package called Optimization Pack.

Over time VKernel released three minor updates for it, introducing valuable features like a monetary evaluation of the resource recovered after the Wastefinder analysis.

Read more

This week the CEOs of both VMware and Red Hat offered very interesting comments on cloud computing that the mainstream press has republished.

First, Paul Maritz, VMware’s CEO, said that customers are now ready to invest in cloud computing after months of putting off the decision due to the economic downturn:

There was a qualitative change in our customer base in the last 18 months…Now, customers really want to go do this.

True or not, one thing is sure. Maritz has all interest in saying so since VMware is about to release its vCloud Service Director (vCSD) in mere two months.

Read more

Apparently, in the effort to comply with the regulations of Section 508 standards for accessibility, VMware exposed part or its entire product roadmap for this year online.

The list includes many products that customers may expect to see at the upcoming VMworld 2010 conference:

• VMware vSphere 4.1
  virtualization.info unveiled the features of this upcoming release in May. It’s very likely that this will become 4.5 to stay aligned with the upcoming View release (see below).
• VMware View 4.5
  View 4.5 was planned for a Q2 launch but has been postponed.
• VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager (SRM) 4.1
• VMware vCloud Service Director (vCSD) 1.0
  virtualization.info detailed the vision and the architecture behind vCSD in January. Some of the features have been unveiled earlier this week.
• VMware vCenter AppSpeed 2.0
• VMware vCenter Lab Manager 4.x

Thanks to NTPRO.nl for the news.

Vizioncore, soon to be fully assimilated into the parent company Quest, just announced the release of a free version of vFoglight, the popular monitoring tool for VMware virtual infrastructures.

The new edition is called vFoglight QuickView and it’s limited to a single VMware vCenter instance, up to 250 virtual machines (and no more than 500 inventory objects in total) and up to 6 reports:

Vizioncore uploaded a 6-minutes video that describes how the product works.

Yesterday Novell announced the upcoming availability of three new major release from its PlateSpin division: Migrate 9.0, Protect 10.0 and Forge 3.0.

All three products have in common the same physical to virtual (P2V) migration engine originally developed by PlateSpin and formerly called PowerConvert.
Over time, PlateSpin first and Novell then, forked it in three different tools to serve different use cases.

The new wave of releases introduces support for Linux guest operating systems, which is available for P2V, V2V and P2P migrations.

In details, this means that PlateSpin Migrate now can apply its Live Transfer and Live Server Sync technologies to Linux workloads. Novell introduces the two new features almost one year ago with Migrate 8.1.
PlateSpin Migrate 9 also supports the migration of Windows Clusters between physical and virtual infrastructures.

Read more