Red Hat will embed VMware in a new desktop OS

At first it was Red Hat Linux (till version 10).
Then Red Hat prefered to move towards a totally commercial way shutting down RHL distribution (and only offering Red Hat Enteprise Linux).
Meanwhile it sponsored a volunteers evolution of RHL: Fedora distribution.
Now Red Hat changed its mind again and announces Red Hat Desktop Linux, which is a commercial distribution.

Apart all these evolutions, what is really interesting is that RH is going to include VMware Workstation inside this new distribution.
RH decided this move to simplify users migration from Windows systems to Linux ones, thinking the same way Microsoft did when acquired Connectix: Red Hat hopes Linux users will run their not-yet-ported Windows applications inside VMware, Microsoft hopes Windows users will run their legacy applications inside Virtual Server.

EMC Corporation answer: why VMware acquisition?

EMC Corp. President and CEO, Joe Tucci finally answer the great question.

Quoting from CRN:


CRN: Why VMware? What was the rationale behind the acquisition of VMware?

Tucci: I think, basically, and everybody uses this word, utility computing. A lot of [utility computing is] around how you virtualize your storage, your network, and your server assets. Over time, it’s clear to me that, at least for storage and servers, that these decisions have to be very coordinated. This technology has to work together. And when you look around at who had the best virtualization software out there, it was clear to me for servers it was VMware. For storage, it was EMC.

This is tricky now, but I’m dedicated to it, and it’s important to your reader base, in the case of VMware I’m absolutely dedicated to let our server partners use that same technology, even if it competes against me.

So IBM is free to take VMware server virtualization technology and combine it with their storage virtualization technology and have a competing offering. That’s part of the rules of being open. But I will certainly look for offerings to do that myself, also.

CRN: If that’s the case, then why acquire VMware? If it’s something that’s going to be completely open, what’s the advantage to EMC?

Tucci: We’ll make money on it. We told the world that VMware did slightly less than $100 million last year, and we said that we could double that. In the first quarter, it did $39 million in revenue, which led everybody to say, ‘Yeah, I guess they can do that.’ A $200 million software business is a pretty valuable commodity. It broadens our horizons.

Umm…Tucci really seems don’t know what to do with VMware technologies at today…

IBM will play the virtualization game

Quoting whole article from Computer World:

IBM today is announcing plans to begin offering new virtualization software and partitioning technology with its servers that will allow them to run as many as 10 versions of an operating system on a single processor.
IBM will add operating system enhancements — job scheduling and workload management capabilities, for example — along with software from its WebSphere, Tivoli and DB2 products to create a series of technologies and services it is calling Virtualization Engine.

This kind of technology has been available to IBM’s mainframe users for years. Virtualization Engine is the result of a three-year program to bring these capabilities to other IBM systems including storage devices, according to Tom Hawk, the general manager of IBM’s enterprise storage group.

It will increase the utilization levels of systems and make them easier to manage, he said. “What we’re really talking about is what I’ll call ‘mainframe-level manageability, discipline and tools,'” he said.

Virtualization Engine will be worked into IBM systems, starting with the iSeries line, which is expected to be refreshed within the next two months.

IBM plans to use technology it has developed internally to enable the partitioning of the Power5 processors, which are used in its iSeries and pSeries servers. The company will use an unnamed third party to deliver partitioning services to its Intel-based xSeries systems, it said.

IBM’s iSeries minicomputer line, formerly known as AS/400, already has a number of useful virtualization capabilities built in, according to Nigel Fortlage, the vice president of GH Young International, an international trade consulting firm based in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

In 2003, GH Young consolidated 16 Intel Corp. servers onto two iSeries machines running Linux, Windows 2000, and the OS/400 operating system that ships with iSeries servers. This saved the company $74,000 in hardware acquisition and maintenance costs, according to Fortlage.

“Prior to doing all of this virtualization, we were spending 95% of our time managing,” said Fortlage. “The iSeries manages so much of the low-level stuff that used to cause the glitches. I don’t have to do the three-finger salute every couple of days; they just run.” He said, referring to the Ctrl-Alt-Delete keyboard combination sometimes required to reboot Windows.

The Virtualization Engine components new to the iSeries will include an embedded version of Tivoli’s Provisioning Manager software, as well as a WebSphere-based grid computing tool kit that will allow customers to run distributed applications using the Open Grid Services Architecture standards.

The partitioning component of Virtualization Engine is similar to VMware Inc.’s GSX Server and ESX Server software and Hewlett-Packard Co.’s Virtual Partitions, Jonathan Eunice, an analyst at Illuminata Inc. in Nashua, N.H., said in an e-mail interview. “VMware does not allow individual applications to use more than two CPUs’ worth of performance. Power partitions scale far higher than VMware can,” Eunice wrote.

IBM, like HP and Sun Microsystems Inc., has done “pretty good” work with its virtualization technology so far, Eunice wrote. “The battle, however, is not just to do pretty good, but to do exceptional virtualization, to make it systematic, and to push its use throughout all the data center and IT processes,” he said. “No vendor and no user is … there yet.”

This is very interesting: IBM promoted VMware technologies so much till today, but it’s probably because wanted to simplify its virtualization technology entry. Now that customers see evident VMware benefits, it’s difficult they don’t look at a technology promising much better performances than VMware.

EMC Corporation moving to incorporate VMware technology in storage boxes

Quoting from Computer World:


Lewis also said EMC eventually plans to sell a single information life-cycle management (ILM) product that will handle the storage of data from creation to deletion on various types of storage, based on automated policies. That process, however, will take years, he said.

In addition, David Donatelli, executive vice president of storage platform operations at EMC, said the company is developing “ILM in a box,” which will use policy-based software and a mix of high-performance and low-end disk drives in the same enclosure to offer tiers of storage.

Donatelli emphasized that VMware’s virtualization software would eventually be incorporated into EMC’s platforms to allow software upgrades to be performed without affecting applications using storage boxes. “This is a mandate we have for all of our products,” he said.

Microsoft SMS 2003 Service Pack 1 will manage Virtual Server 2005 and Virtual PC 2004

Quoting from Winbeta:

Microsoft has notified participents enrolled in the Systems Management Server 2003 Open Beta program that a build of Service Pack 1 is now available. Previously only the SP1 SDK had been available.

According to Microsoft SP1 includes a series of enhancements to tighten security, increase reliability and improve scalability of SMS.

SP1 also broadens the supported configurations to include Workgroups along with support for both Virtual Server 2005 and Virtual PC. The final version of SP1, due in June, will also include advanced client support for systems with 64-bit processors.

Get rid of MAC address limit on VMware VMs

Many of you use VMware to build large honeynet systems but a great problem of doing this is VMs fingerprinting caused by obliged VMware Vendor ID in VMs MAC Address.
I still remember my first post on VMware newsgroup asking how to workaround this limit and assign a totally arbitrary MAC address to my VMs.

Now the problem is raised on Honeypots Mailing List, a security ML hosted by SecurityFocus, and one gentle French Honeypot Project member, Kostya Kortchinsky, posted the solution (at least on VMware for Linux) for us.

Obviously this is something not supported by VMware and I’m sure will never be 🙂
But if meanwhile someone would produce a “VMware MAC verification patcher”, would be nice… 🙂

Last hour update: another ML user reported this patch also works with Workstation 4.5.1. Enjoy!

IBM is preparing SAN Volume Controller for VMware ESX Server 2.1

Quoting from The Register:


IBM is convinced that Version 1.2 of the SAN Volume Controller will give it much more direct access into EMC’s customer base. IBM/EMC customers can now pool their storage hardware together. IBM’s SAN software makes it possible to modify volumes on either IBM or EMC hardware without requiring changes to a host application. Other updates in Version 1.2 include support for Windows Server 2003, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Server 3.0, Solaris 9 and VMware ESX Server 2.1.

This is an important move since IBM beats EMC on its own field: since VMware acquisition, EMC was expected to tight together all acquired products, expanding capabilities and improving actual features.
Now IBM is expanding VMware products capabilities better and faster than EMC…

TwoOSTwo project suddenly terminated (?)

Without any notice TwoOSTwo websites .com, .org disappeared.
The development team, Parallels Ltd., instead is always there and still provides news about a “virtual machine” product, but there is no Downloads section available.

Anyway if you like here’s the direct link for the lastest version: http://download.parallels.ru/files/twoOStwo-2-30-40B.exe

Thanks to Raffaele Valensise for ths news.

More on VMware 64bit coming products

Paul Thurrott, a Microsoft MVP, reports on Windows Network & .NET Magazine:

Last week’s editorial about virtual machines (VMs) generated several email discussions, but the most frequent question I received concerned 64-bit computing. What are VMware and Microsoft doing to support 64-bit platforms with their VM environments? Although I’m still waiting for a reply from Microsoft, I was able to talk with VMware, and I think you’ll be pleased with the response. First, VMware will support AMD Athlon 64 and Intel x86 64-bit (i.e., non-Itanium) platforms with new releases of all its virtualization products. VMware will release these products over the next 18 months, starting with a preview 64-bit version of its VMware Workstation product that should ship this summer. The company’s 64-bit products will be compatible with all the 16-bit and 32-bit VMs rolled out on today’s x86 systems, giving customers clear migration possibilities for the future.

Most interesting, perhaps, is the support VMware plans for 64-bit guests (i.e., software-based virtual environments). Over time, VMware will support every possible combination of 32-bit and 64-bit hardware and software, so eventually you’ll be able to run 64-bit VM environments on both 32-bit and 64-bit hardware. This interoperability means that customers will be able to test 64-bit compatibility on their current 32-bit systems, before moving to new 64-bit hardware. This capability won’t be available immediately, but I’m impressed that it’s going to happen.

Wondering about Itanium support? VMware says it will monitor that market, but my gut feeling is that Itanium sales will never reach the volumes needed for VMware to support it.

In my last post I supposed ESX and GSX 64bit products would be released within 6 months after 64bit Workstation edition, then maybe I went wrong of some months.