VMware is building support for Intel FlexMigration in its VMotion

With its new Quad-Core Xeon 7300 CPU family Intel introduced another enhancement for virtualization, FlexMigration, which simplifies virtual to virtual (V2V) migrations between physical hosts with older generations of Intel processors.

VMware is working to support this technology in upcoming versions of its VMotion, integrated into VirtualCenter, as InformationWeek reports:

VMware is building support for Intel’s FlexMigration assist for virtualized environments in VMware’s Vmotion technology, which is used to move running virtual machines from one physical server to another. The collaboration is expected to help VMware customers move virtual machines to Intel’s upcoming processors based on its 45nm scale process technology, Jake Smith of Intel’s Advance Server Technology Group told InformationWeek…

Microsoft will deliver a lightweight version of SoftGrid 4.5

Chad Jones, SoftGrid Product Manager, reports that upcoming SoftGrid 4.5 will feature a lightweight version without Active Directory and SQL Server as mandatory requirements.

SoftGrid’s tight integration with Active Directory is at the same time one of the biggest constrains and one of the biggest values the product has. Having an AD-free version is a welcome news for smaller SMBs and enterprises wanting to deploy virtual applications inside DMZs and branch offices.

SoftGrid 4.5 is already available for TAP customers, will be in open beta by the end of October and may hit the market before summer 2008, as Microsoft itself detailed few months ago.

Thanks to InfoWorld for the news.

VMLogix appoints Sameer Dholakia as new CEO, plans expansion

Quoting from the VMLogix official announcement:

VMLogix, Inc., a global provider of virtual infrastructure management technology to streamline the software development lifecycle, today announced the appointment of Sameer Dholakia as chief executive officer. Sameer brings extensive experience in the enterprise software industry having held key leadership roles in product management, sales, and business development, and will lead the company as it expands its team and global operations.

Prior to VMLogix, Dholakia held numerous positions at Trilogy, Inc., most recently managing west coast operations in the U.S. where he established the company’s consumer electronics vertical and expanded its install base in the automotive industry. During his tenure with the company, Dholakia also served as VP of Alliances where he managed an organization responsible for developing Trilogy’s strategic partnerships. He began his career with Trilogy in product management, leading the creation of the company’s second major application business. Dholakia received his bachelor and master’s degree from Stanford University, and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Palo Alto with a strong engineering team in Bangalore, India, VMLogix has also recently opened an office in Toronto, Canada, and plans to expand staff in sales, client services and support…

Yankee Group bets on virtual desktops future

Quoting from VNUNet:

Virtual desktops will allow IT managers to offload the burden of managing all the devices on their network, according to an industry analyst.

George Hamilton, director of enterprise infrastructure at Yankee Group, believes that users will be able to purchase their own devices from normal shops, and use consumer support services rather than having to bother the IT team…

Read the whole article at the source.

Despite Yankee Group doesn’t provide a timeframe for this VDI-based future, this forecast has been included in virtualization.info Virtualization Industry Predictions accordingly.

RingCube launches free version of its desktop virtualization solution MojoPac

One year ago a new startup called RingCube appeared on the market with a desktop virtualization solution called MojoPac, mostly targeting mobile users. A direction that even bigger players (like VMware or Qumranet) may decide to take one day or another.

In this year RingCube raised a $12 million funding but failed to impose in the market, probably because its proposal is too ahead of times.

So to improve its solution’s adoption the company launches today a free version of MojoPac, Freedom, introducing an odd business model for virtualization market: each user installing the product will send his data (in anonymous way) to RingCube which will use it for future promotions (advertising inside future updates), as revealed by PC World.

If this is acceptable for you download MojoPac Freedom here.

Xen-based Amazon EC2 suffers major faults

First major attempt to use hardware virtualization for general purpose grid computing was launched in August 2006 by Amazon under the name of Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2).

The system is powered by the Xen open source hypervisor and in more than one year has been used by thousand of users for several tasks, attracted by reliabily such service should offer.

Now this reliability may be severely in doubt: the EC2 service is suffering major faults since a couple of days, when tents (if not hundreds) of users started to lose their virtual instances without any reason, while others started to experiment extreme slowness.

The outage, confirmed by Amazon, revealed the company didn’t use any redundancy solution to protect EC2 instances, so that users lost their environments and data irremediably.

This is not the first time Amazon has problems with the facility: in October 2006 a security issue allowed EC2 users to see other users data in dismissed virtual instances.

After the new issue, mining company credibility once again, Amazon is called to answer several questions about the operational framework and security measures it’s using in the Xen virtual datacenter.

Speech: Nordic Virtualization Forum 2007

For October 22-23 Conductive, a Sweden firm focused on conferences and seminaries, arranged first edition of the Nordic Virtualization Forum 2007 in Stockholm.

I’ll be there to perform the opening keynote, talking about virtualization industry today, emerging and consolidated market trends (with some news from just passed VMworld 2007) and industry challenges.

I’ll also moderate the panel at the end of first day, trying to skake up the discussion about virtualization ROI, Management issues and implementation best practices.

The complete agenda is available here, while registration is available here.

This will be my first speech in Sweden and I’d be happy to meet any virtualization.info reader attending. Be sure to stop by and say hello.

(to see other events where I’ll have a lecture check my speaking schedule)

VMware flattens its sales channel

In the last four years the VMware sales channel undergo several transformations, some of them less appreciated than others by company partners.

The last one took place this September when VMware decided to allow each resellers in the channel to sell the entire product line, practically equalizing entry-level Professional partners with Enterprise and Premium ones.

The new channel configuration is still made by these three levels but the difference is now minimal: higher partnership levels benefit are now reduced to sales opportunity registration and a bunch of discounts for internal use software and technical training.

On top of that a VIP Professional partner is no more required to correspond an annual fee to maintain its status, and can sign-on after certifying one single person, which has to pass a very simple non-technical online exam. This basically means that almost every virtualization professional on the market may become a VMware VIP Professional tomorrow with almost no effort.

In March 2006 virtualization.info predicted a hard time for resellers in VIP Professional level because of free products (Player and Server) and VMware online store.

This move may be a try to save them, but it seems to damage the entire channel instead, increasing number of incompetent resellers at Professional level, and punishing Enterprise and Premium levels which invested a lot of money in staff certification, annual fees and business plans VMware requires.

Tensions between VMware and EMC?

Quoting from the The Register:

We find a VMware with a market cap of $32bn – a figure rapidly approaching that of its big daddy EMC at $43bn.

Even with the analysts hyping EMC at the same time they hype VMware, the very real possibility exists that VMware’s valuation will in fact jump right past EMC’s…

Well, I’ve heard rumors that VMware CEO Diane Greene and EMC CEO Joe Tucci already have a strained relationship. These are only rumors, mind you, and nothing more.

Even if things have yet to reach Tension Point, however, they almost certainly will in the coming months should VMware’s stock keep soaring. Why should the flashy, nimble VMware remain controlled by a lumbering disk vendor like EMC, especially if VMware is mightier on paper than EMC? Why should Greene be bullied by five – out of six – board members with very strong – often direct – ties to EMC? Why should VMware be weighed down by EMC’s baggage? Let’s not forget that the company competes against VMware’s strongest allies.

VMware’s rocketing share price would seem to exacerbate any existing tensions. In addition, it may well create new tensions. Will Greene take any guff at all from Tucci and Co. when she’s responsible for the storage vendor’s Wall Street revitalization? I can’t help but wonder if Greene doesn’t eye that EMC CEO post…

Read the whole article at the source.

USB 3.0 will support virtualization

At Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2007 eWeek interviewed Justin Rattner, CTO at Intel, which revealed how upcoming USB 3.0 is being designed to support virtualization:

We think that virtualization is a great, powerful technology that is at its earliest stage of its application. We’d now like to get back to the security application, which is where we started. We are just bringing out this trusted execution technology, which we used to call “LaGrande,” which guarantees that the image you load in the virtual machine is the image that you wanted to load. So we have this notion of secure boot, and we’d like to get back to that. We have focused a lot on processor virtualization, and there’s a lot of work to be done on platform virtualization. How do we virtualize the platform so we have to do less in software and do more in the hardware? One of the things that we are doing with the USB 3.0 development is to develop the changes in USB architecture to support virtualization and then you have to look at what we are doing with PCI Express and USB and graphics. We have an eye toward supporting virtualized environments…

Read the whole article at the source.

ExtremeTech reports some specification details and tentative dates for market launch of 3.0 devices:

USB 3.0 is built upon, and is backwards-compatible with, the USB 2.0 “High Speed” spec. It would be generous to even call the specifications “early” at this stage, but the group still had lots of information about how USB 3.0 will work and what features it will provide. The spec should be finalized sometime in the middle of 2008, with initial devices available in ’09, and broad deployment by 2010.

The main two goals of SuperSpeed USB are to provide a 10X boost in transfer rate (from 480-Mbits/s in USB 2.0 to 4.8 Gbits/s in USB 3.0), while dramatically lowering power consumption. One example of their speed goals is to transfer a 27GB HD movie to a portable device in 70 seconds. The same thing would take 15 minutes or more with HighSpeed USB (2.0). The SuperSpeed devices will use the same connectors and the same programming and device models as existing devices.

Device virtualization will be an important part of the new USB spec as well. The Promotions Group wants to make sure that virtual machines can access USB 3.0 devices without software intervention. A final concern is over Mass Storage Device drivers. Currently, MSD drivers for USB 2.0 devices have enough overhead to limit performance to around 32 Mbytes/sec. The overhead in this driver model would just kill the great potential for SuperSpeed USB hard drives and flash storage performance, so a new, more efficient driver model is needed. This is out of the purview of the USB spec itself, but the teams involved want to work hand in hand with the driver specifications groups to make sure USB 3.0 Mass Storage Devices can live up to their potential.