ORSYP joins VMware Alliance Partner Program

Quoting from the ORSYP official announcement:

ORSYP, worldwide provider of enterprise job scheduling solutions and services, today announced the availability of its solutions on the platforms of VMware, the global leader in virtual infrastructure software for industry-standard systems.

With this certification, ORSYP’s flagship enterprise IT automation solution is confirmed compliant for the VMware virtualization infrastructures. ORSYP is also listed as a member of the VMware Technology Alliance Partner (TAP) Program…

Microsoft to launch Viridian Rapid Deployment Program

In a very informal way James O’Neil, IT Professional Evangelist at Microsoft, announces that the company is now accepting nominations for Windows Server Virtualization (WSV, aka codename Viridian) Rapid Deployment Program (RDP):

We are getting ready to take nominations for this programme: It’s not an open beta program (it is expected to have only about 40 places) so most people will be turned away. There is a second programme called the Momentum programme which provides a lower level of support.

Our Goals

  • Build closer relationship with customers to get deployment feedback
  • Understand and document best practices
  • Develop Case study evidence and customer references for the product launch

We will provide

  • Early Access to Pre-Release Code and information
  • Technical Support – providing an escalation contact and access to Premier support
  • Access to application compatibility and test teams
  • Part payment of consulting costs associated with the project

Customer Requirements

  • Commit to deploying Windows Server Virtualization and / or System Center Virtual Machine Manager (we expect to see Executive sponsoring participation, a project manager and other staff allocated to the programme)
  • Participate in regular status conference calls and training, and provide Provide ongoing status updates and surveys
  • Pay part of consulting costs (Yes. You have to spend money to be on this programme)
  • Install pre-release code into a production environment (unlike most beta programmes, we will support RDP participants running pre-release code in production)

If you want to enroll in this program, which is parallel to traditional beta programs, send an email to James.

Thanks to Steven Bink for the news.

4Blox joins VMware Technology Alliance Partner Program

Quoting from the 4Blox official announcement:

4Blox, Inc., dedicated to improving iSCSI SAN performance, today announced that it has teamed with two leading technology vendors, Red Hat, the world’s leading provider of open source solutions, and VMware, in its efforts to build a strong network of industry partners to ensure delivery of high-performance storage solutions that meet market requirements.

The company has also joined VMware’s Technology Alliance Partner (TAP) program. Virtualization is driving a data center infrastructure refresh, but with virtualization comes increased host CPU resource constraints associated with storage protocol processing. 4Blox’s software approach to iSCSI acceleration can be dynamically enabled in one or more Guest OSes offering storage system vendors a more flexible and lower-cost alternative to hardware-based offload processing solutions.

iSCSI-based Storage Area Networks (SANs) experience severe system performance degradation when used on standalone servers with large numbers of users or with bandwidth intensive applications – like backup and video, and on virtualized servers where CPU resources are constrained by multiple Guest OSes. The CPUs deployed in typical storage subsystems are quickly overloaded with iSCSI processing and 10GbE connections can exhaust host CPU processing with even a small number of users…

4Blox produces high performances iSCSI target and initiator called 4Mezzo. The company will probably work with VMware to certify and include 4Mezzo in upcoming versions of ESX Server.

Linux kernel development will focus on OS virtualization for the next 1-2 years

At the end of his speech at LinuxWorld 2007, Andrew Morton, lead developer of Linux kernel, revealed that maintainers efforts will focus, among other things, on OS virtualization technologies.

And this despite Linux already implements a hardware virtualization solution (KVM) and has several 3rd party OS virtualization solutions available (OpenVZ, FreeVPS, Linux-VServer).

Thanks to Kir Kolyshkin for the news.

Parallels Server will not be a true bare-metal hypervisor

Contrary to what every news magazine reported (including virtualization.info) the upcoming server virtualization product called Parallels Server will not be a true bare-metal hypervisor (aka type-1 VMM).

virtualization.info met a Parallels engineer at past VMworld 2007 which confirmed that first edition of this product will be able to install on bare metal, but will not use an architecture comparable with one used in VMware ESX Server, Xen-based products or upcoming Microsoft codename Viridian.

virtualization.info received few details but it seems that when installed on bare-metal, Parallels will first deploy a custom Linux distribution with Parallels Server on top of it. So we are talking about a hosted VMM solution, nearer to VMware Server and Microsoft Virtual Server.

Parallels plans to move to a true hypervisor architecture in following versions of the product but didn’t disclose any specific timeframe.

VMware certifies IBM Storage SAN Volume Controller

Quoting from the IBM official announcement:

IBM today announced that its flagship storage virtualization solution — IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller (SVC) — has been certified by VMware for use in conjunction with VMware Infrastructure.

In independent benchmarks designed and audited by the Storage Performance Council, IBM’s SVC is the highest performing benchmarked storage virtualization solution in the world today — with speeds over 75 percent above its predecessor. Through working with IBM directly or with its strategic business partners, implementing SAN Volume Controller unlocks proprietary holds vendors have had on customers for years, having the capabilities to virtualize across disparate hardware vendors systems…

Demo: Microsoft SoftGrid Virtual Application Advanced Sequencing

Microsoft published an interesting 90-minutes virtual lab on its TechNet facility about SoftGrid:

In this lab, you will walk-through performing a Virtual File System (VFS) installation of an application as well as a sequencing of a web-based plug-in. Before working on this lab, you should be familiar with the basic concepts of the SoftGrid environment.

Setting up a lab for SoftGrid may be time consuming and resources demanding, so this online facility is highly recommended for ones that never had a chance to try the product.

Register for it here.

Whitepaper: Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 integration whitepapers

While waiting for new hypervisor codename Viridian, Microsoft is pushing more on Virtual Server 2005, and published a set of 10 whitepaper to provide guidance in several integration scenarios:

Thanks to Tony Bailey for the news.

Review: CRN compares most popular virtualization platforms

CRN published a basic review of most popular virtualization platforms on the market today, assigning a rating to each one:

  • 1st – VMware Infrastructure 3
  • 2nd – XenSource XenEnterprise 4
  • 3rd – SWsoft Virtuozzo 3.5.1
  • 4th – Virtual Iron 4.0

Reviewer provided following conclusion:

While all four virtualization solutions accommodate the needs of IT development, VMware stood above the others for providing the best end-to-end virtualized environment specifically designed for development.

The biggest challenge for IT is to build communications between a large team working on the same development project. VMware’s ESX server is built for that, including the most features by far. XenSource’s XenServer is the simplest product to use and has new features that enable it to compete on a more level playing field with VMware and SWsoft. XenEnterprise is price-competitive and also scales higher than VMware’s enterprise solution.

SWsoft offers an interface that’s easy to understand, but its capabilities don’t rise to the level many development teams would require. Virtual Iron’s interface just wasn’t friendly enough for engineers to build simple workflows.

Simply put, systems integrators and application providers can certainly use all four products to develop and test systems but on more complex distributed infrastructures, they will be hard-pressed to meet deadlines without VMware’s Lab Manager to monitor workflow, integration schedules and code assets.

Read the whole comparison at the source.