Why VMware doesn’t buy Teradici?

Posted by virtualization.info Staff   |   Thursday, March 25th, 2010   |  

vmware logoVMware and Teradici announced their technology agreement in September 2008.
The two co-developed a software version of the Teradici PC over IP (PCoIP) remoting protocol for over one year, and officially included it in View 4.0.

VMware has other OEM partnerships. With ThinPrint, since a long time, for example. The last one is with Likewise. But none of them can be considered instrumental to the success of a core product like View.
And, apparently, the VMware-Teradici version of PCoIP competes pretty well against Citrix HDX. It should be competitive also against the upcoming Microsoft RemoteFX.

The point is that, as far as we can understand, the agreement with Teradici is not exclusive. The company may close a similar deal with other vendors, but most of all, it may receive an unsolicited acquisition proposal.

In the unlikely event that Teradici would be acquired by someone else, what would happen to PCoIP?
Depending on current license agreement terms, it may or may not disappear from the VMware website in a day, and disappear from View at the first product upgrade, pretty much like it happened with Symantec when VMware acquired RTO Software.

What would happen to customers? Simply, they would have to go back to RDP, the other remoting protocol supported by View. But it’s not so simple.
While there’s no service disruption, the usability of the VDI environment would be impacted.
More than that, the presence (meaning the architecture and the performance) of PCoIP has a significant weight which influences, and will influence, many deals. Without PCoIP, some customers may have considered alternatives, and designed their VDI architectures in a completely different way.

Of course the scenario above is completely unlikely. Nobody really expects that VMware will let Teradici go, but then, why the company has not been acquired?
Maybe at the beginning of this partnership, VMware was not 100% confident in the capability to deliver a satisfying software-only version of PCoIP, but now?
Is it possible that VMware prefers to get involved in a bid war to keep control of PCoIP in case of an unsolicited proposal for Teradici rather than just buying its partner at a fair price today? Or there are other reasons that impede the acquisition and the current technology partnership is the only way to circumvent them?



blog comments powered by Disqus


virtualization.info Newest articles
Paper: VMware vSphere Metro Storage Cluster Case Study

May 23rd, 2012

Yesterday VMware published a paper focused on VMware vMSC (vSphere Metro Storage Cluster), a new configuration within the VMware Hardware Compatibility List intended for environments where disaster/downtime avoidance is a…

EMC acquires Syncplicity

May 22nd, 2012

Yesterday, during its annual conference in Las Vegas, EMC announced the acquisition of Syncplicity, a cloud-storage privately held startup founded in 2008 and based in Menlo Park, California.
Terms…

Release: Oracle VM Server for x86 3.1

May 21st, 2012

On May 18th Oracle announced the general availability of version 3.1 of its x86 enterprise virtualization solution VM Server.
This release follows 3.0 announced on August 24th 2011.
All the new…

VMware shows View 5.1 performance improvements

May 21st, 2012

In this post, published on May 18 in VROOM! Blog, the VMware’s Performance Team presented some of the most significant enhancements and optimizations brought to Teradici‘s PCoIP protocol in the…

NVIDIA introduces World’s Firs Virtualized GPU

May 17th, 2012

On May 15th NVIDIA unveiled the NVIDIA® VGX™ platform that will be available later this year through NVIDIA’s hardware OEM and VDI partners.
This new platform promises to deliver…

Microsoft announces Assessment and Planning Toolkit 7.0 Beta Program

May 17th, 2012

Microsoft announced this week the new Beta version of its capacity planning tool Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) 7.0 Beta.
The Beta program opened on May 15th and the review…

VMware announces vFabric Suite 5.1

May 15th, 2012

Today VMware announced VMware vFabric Suite 5.1, expected to be generally available in Q2 2012.
vFabric Suite 5.1 includes vFabric Application Director, to automate the deployment and management of vFabric…

VMware CTO talks about R&D plans for the future

May 15th, 2012

On April 4 Stephen Herrod, VMware’s CTO, has attended, as guest speaker, at a VMUG meeting in Italy.
One of the key point of the speech, documented in one hour-long…

Citrix Hosted Server VDI Tech Preview

May 14th, 2012

Last week Citrix announced a new tech preview for Hosted Server VDI technology that allows cloud providers to leverage Microsoft SPLA to host VDI-style desktops obtaining a pay-as-you-go monthly subscription licensing…

Release: Atlantis ILIO Diskless VDI 3.2

May 11th, 2012

On May 7 Atlantis Computing announced the general availability of its Atlantis ILIO Diskless VDI 3.2, this product, tailored in particular for VMware View 5.1, enables virtual desktops deployment…

Citrix unveils Project Aruba

May 11th, 2012

On May 7 Citrix announced a technology preview of Project Aruba that extends Citrix VDI all-in-one proposal for the SMB market, VDI-in-a-Box, with personal vDisk technology.
VDI-in-a-Box, inherited from Kaviza…

Cloud Sidekick announced Early Access release of Cato EE

May 10th, 2012

On May 7 Cloud Sidekick announced the Early Access Program release of Cato Enterprise Edition (EE) which extends the Community Edition (CE) with Storm Deployment Automation and support for…

Release: VMware vCenter Infrastructure Navigator (VIN) 1.1

May 9th, 2012

On April 26 VMware announced the general availability of VMware vCenter Infrastructure Navigator (VIN) 1.1, previously introduced as a part of vCenter Operations Management Suite.
VIN automatically detects, discovers and…

VMware accelerates security updates after ESX source code leak

May 8th, 2012

On May 3 VMware released a security update, that the company itself define as “accelerated“, with the purpose to patch five “critical” security issues across VMware ESX and ESXi hypervisor…

 
Monthly Archive