Does anyone care about virtualization performance in 2010?
Vendors’ marketing departments spend a lot of time promoting performance analysis when a new virtualization platform or a new server hardware hits the market, but are the customers interested?
Right now we have only two benchmarks methodologies to measure virtual infrastructures: the VMware VMmark (launched in July 2007) and the Intel vConsolidate (launched in December 2006).
There’s also an ongoing activity at the Standard Performance Evaluation Corp. (SPEC) to define a standard practice but the development is so slow that nobody really knows if hardware virtualization will still be around for its release.
Additionally, virtualization.info got a tip that Intel discontinued vConsolidate during the second half of 2009 (we are still waiting for an official answer on this).
This means that the VMware’s benchmark platform is the only option customers have to compare servers and hypervisors.
It could be fair enough if every vendor would recognize and support VMmark, turning it into a de facto industry standard. Unfortunately it’s not the case because the VMware EULAs prohibits to openly use the tool and publish independent comparisons. After three years (VMmark 1.0 beta was released in December 2006) VMware still requires to review and approve any VMmark-based analysis.
VMware is not the one to blame for this.
In any open and competitive market customers would complain as long as VMware doesn’t change its policy or, more likely, the VMware competitors wouldn’t work together to offer something better.
In three years the amount of customers that openly complained about the VMmark EULA is minimal.
In part it depends on the fact that VMware ESX has led the market for so long that just a few really needed something to compare hypervisors’ performance. In part it depends on the fact that performance measurement isn’t a key aspect of product evaluation for most companies.
The lack of alternatives from other vendors (namely Microsoft, Citrix, Oracle and Parallels) instead may depend on the fact that no vendor has an interest in highlighting its product’s deficiencies compared to the market leader.
It’s much more comfortable to blame VMware for its absurd EULA and use this as an excuse to not recognize any comparison unless it turns out to be positive.
But now we are in 2010. VMware’s competitors release hypervisors that are getting more and more mature, customers are seriously evaluating alternatives, sites with heterogeneous virtual infrastructures are no more an unlikely scenario.
Is it time for an open comparison or performance measurement became just a marketing exercise?
virtualization.info Newest articles
September 2nd, 2010
VMworld 2010 is at its last day and VMware decided to place the second keynote today. The second keynote is usually more technical than the first one, but as virtualization.info…
August 31st, 2010
Here we go again. As usual virtualization.info is at the VMworld conference to live cover the keynotes and any other major announcement released by VMware during the event.
Paul Maritz,…
August 30th, 2010
Just before the VMworld 2010 opening keynote, cloudcomputing.info received a couple of confirmations that VMware is about to rename its not-yet-launched vCloud Service Director (vCSD) in just vCloud Director. This…
August 30th, 2010
In the attempt to distract the audience just before the VMware VMworld 2010 opening keynote, Citrix announced last week the imminent availability of XenClient 1.0.
The Xen-based client hypervisor (see…
August 30th, 2010
Just one day before the VMware VMworld 2010 opening keynote, Citrix managed to distract the audience with a major announcement: the acquisition of VMLogix for an undisclosed sum.
VMLogix entered…
August 19th, 2010
Earlier this week Symantec announced two new products for VMware virtual infrastructures dubbed ApplicationHA and VirtualStore.
ApplicationHA, powered by Veritas Cluster Server technology, monitors applications and virtual machines health. It…
August 19th, 2010
Yesterday CA announced the release of a new version of IT Client Manager (ITCM), its systems management software.
ITCM integrates multiple other CA products, including Asset Management, Software Delivery, Remote…
August 19th, 2010
A couple of weeks ago Veeam silently released a free edition of its reporting solution Reporter.
Reporter 4.0 was released in May, introducing a web GUI, change management reports and…
August 19th, 2010
Vizioncore has recently lost its Vice President of EMEA region, virtualization.info has learned.
Roger Baskerville was the EMEA Sales Director at XenSource before the Citrix acquisition. He then covered the…
August 18th, 2010
For years Google has been pretty adamant that it doesn’t need hardware virtualization.Everything started in 2007 when a Google engineer, Luiz André Barroso, said at the Usenix conference:
I think it…
August 18th, 2010
Despite its position in the VDI market is not exactly comfortable at the moment, VMware is taking interesting steps. The company just signed agreements with a couple of VDI vendors,…
August 18th, 2010
HP has recently published a reference architecture for VDI environments based on Citrix XenDesktop 4, System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) 2008 R2 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V.
The…
August 18th, 2010
In May Microsoft finally unveiled an upcoming, revamped version of its patch management solution for virtual infrastructures: Virtual Machine Servicing Tool (VMST) 3.0
VMST is not a patching tool per…
August 18th, 2010
VMware continues to release new technical papers about vSphere 4.1. After Understanding Memory Resource Management in VMware ESX 4.1, Enhanced VMware ESX 4.1 CPU Scheduler and Host Profiles: Technical Overview, today virtualization.info…
Copyright © 2003-2010 virtualization.info. All rights reserved.
virtualization.info | cloudcomputing.info | virtualization.tv | Virtualization Congress