Does anyone care about virtualization performance in 2010?
Vendors’ marketing departments spend a lot of time promoting performance analysis when a new virtualization platform or a new server hardware hits the market, but are the customers interested?
Right now we have only two benchmarks methodologies to measure virtual infrastructures: the VMware VMmark (launched in July 2007) and the Intel vConsolidate (launched in December 2006).
There’s also an ongoing activity at the Standard Performance Evaluation Corp. (SPEC) to define a standard practice but the development is so slow that nobody really knows if hardware virtualization will still be around for its release.
Additionally, virtualization.info got a tip that Intel discontinued vConsolidate during the second half of 2009 (we are still waiting for an official answer on this).
This means that the VMware’s benchmark platform is the only option customers have to compare servers and hypervisors.
It could be fair enough if every vendor would recognize and support VMmark, turning it into a de facto industry standard. Unfortunately it’s not the case because the VMware EULAs prohibits to openly use the tool and publish independent comparisons. After three years (VMmark 1.0 beta was released in December 2006) VMware still requires to review and approve any VMmark-based analysis.
VMware is not the one to blame for this.
In any open and competitive market customers would complain as long as VMware doesn’t change its policy or, more likely, the VMware competitors wouldn’t work together to offer something better.
In three years the amount of customers that openly complained about the VMmark EULA is minimal.
In part it depends on the fact that VMware ESX has led the market for so long that just a few really needed something to compare hypervisors’ performance. In part it depends on the fact that performance measurement isn’t a key aspect of product evaluation for most companies.
The lack of alternatives from other vendors (namely Microsoft, Citrix, Oracle and Parallels) instead may depend on the fact that no vendor has an interest in highlighting its product’s deficiencies compared to the market leader.
It’s much more comfortable to blame VMware for its absurd EULA and use this as an excuse to not recognize any comparison unless it turns out to be positive.
But now we are in 2010. VMware’s competitors release hypervisors that are getting more and more mature, customers are seriously evaluating alternatives, sites with heterogeneous virtual infrastructures are no more an unlikely scenario.
Is it time for an open comparison or performance measurement became just a marketing exercise?
virtualization.info Newest articles
May 22nd, 2012
Yesterday, during its annual conference in Las Vegas, EMC announced the acquisition of Syncplicity, a cloud-storage privately held startup founded in 2008 and based in Menlo Park, California.
Terms…
May 21st, 2012
On May 18th Oracle announced the general availability of version 3.1 of its x86 enterprise virtualization solution VM Server.
This release follows 3.0 announced on August 24th 2011.
All the new…
May 21st, 2012
In this post, published on May 18 in VROOM! Blog, the VMware’s Performance Team presented some of the most significant enhancements and optimizations brought to Teradici‘s PCoIP protocol in the…
May 17th, 2012
On May 15th NVIDIA unveiled the NVIDIA® VGX™ platform that will be available later this year through NVIDIA’s hardware OEM and VDI partners.
This new platform promises to deliver…
May 17th, 2012
Microsoft announced this week the new Beta version of its capacity planning tool Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) 7.0 Beta.
The Beta program opened on May 15th and the review…
May 15th, 2012
Today VMware announced VMware vFabric Suite 5.1, expected to be generally available in Q2 2012.
vFabric Suite 5.1 includes vFabric Application Director, to automate the deployment and management of vFabric…
May 15th, 2012
On April 4 Stephen Herrod, VMware’s CTO, has attended, as guest speaker, at a VMUG meeting in Italy.
One of the key point of the speech, documented in one hour-long…
May 14th, 2012
Last week Citrix announced a new tech preview for Hosted Server VDI technology that allows cloud providers to leverage Microsoft SPLA to host VDI-style desktops obtaining a pay-as-you-go monthly subscription licensing…
May 11th, 2012
On May 7 Atlantis Computing announced the general availability of its Atlantis ILIO Diskless VDI 3.2, this product, tailored in particular for VMware View 5.1, enables virtual desktops deployment…
May 11th, 2012
On May 7 Citrix announced a technology preview of Project Aruba that extends Citrix VDI all-in-one proposal for the SMB market, VDI-in-a-Box, with personal vDisk technology.
VDI-in-a-Box, inherited from Kaviza…
May 10th, 2012
On May 7 Cloud Sidekick announced the Early Access Program release of Cato Enterprise Edition (EE) which extends the Community Edition (CE) with Storm Deployment Automation and support for…
May 9th, 2012
On April 26 VMware announced the general availability of VMware vCenter Infrastructure Navigator (VIN) 1.1, previously introduced as a part of vCenter Operations Management Suite.
VIN automatically detects, discovers and…
May 8th, 2012
On May 3 VMware released a security update, that the company itself define as “accelerated“, with the purpose to patch five “critical” security issues across VMware ESX and ESXi hypervisor…
May 7th, 2012
On May 3 VMware announced it has joined the Facebook Open Compute Project, an initiative launched in 2011, with the objective of increase technology efficiencies and reduce the environmental impact…
Copyright © 2003-2012 virtualization.info. All rights reserved.
virtualization.info | cloudcomputing.info | virtualization.tv | Virtualization Congress