EMC attacks Oracle on its VMware support policy

Posted by virtualization.info Staff   |   Monday, May 4th, 2009   |  

emc logo

More than one year and a half ago Oracle has broken its happy marriage with VMware, announcing its own hypervisor and clarifying that its software is not supported on ESX or any other 3rd party virtualization platform.
As a matter of fact the new support policy that Oracle introduced obliges its customers to adopt Oracle VM Server or give up virtualization (here’s a very recent and deep analysis of the support policy provided by an Oracle professional).

At that time the public reaction of VMware was firm but polite, expressed in a long document that explains why Oracle products run well on ESX.
Probably VMware didn’t react more aggressively in the hope to recover the relationship with the database vendor, knowing how critical is Oracle for its audience. But so far there’s no data about how many customers really followed the VMware suggestion deciding to virtualize anyway.

Now, someone at EMC, the VMware parent company, must have decided that it’s finally time to take a strong position on this topic.

For the first time in public to our knowledge, not one but two high-level executives at EMC decided to comment the Oracle support policy: Chad Sakac, Vice President of VMware Technology Alliance, and Chuck Hollis, Vice President, Global Marketing CTO, used their personal blogs, the same day, to attack Oracle and incite the customers to rebel:

Chad Sakac:


Customer after customer is telling me about Oracle sales heavy-handed tactics pushing them away from VMware.   Consistently, they point to a well-known metalink article.   Now, clear support positions are a GOOD THING.  But in this case, Oracle seems to be calling out a position where normally they don’t.

Has Oracle put the fear of god into you re: Oracle on VMware?   Have your Oracle sales teams pointed to the metalink article and said “it’s not supported on VMware, don’t do it”?   While there’s no question an ISV is entitled to bring you a value proposition of “the full stack” – what do you think about ISVs who dictate a specific infrastructure design, particularly when it diverges with what you’re trying to do in the datacenter? If you’re not happy about Oracle’s support position – and are an Oracle customer – POST YOUR COMMENTS below!

Chuck Hollis:

VMware Functionality Competes With Oracle DBMS Features

Now we’re getting warmer.  Much warmer. 

Oracle hasn’t come out and said this to the best of my knowledge, but it’s pretty clear to many of us that this is the case.

Let’s construct a side-by-sde mental model of two similar Oracle DBMS configurations.

On one hand, we’ve got a multi-server configuration running Oracle’s latest (and most expensive) RAC product.  It’s doing load balancing, high availability, and making the hardware function as a giant pool.

Nice.

On the other hand, we’ve got the same multi-server configuration running the much cheaper Oracle SE on VMware. 

It too is load balancing, offers high availability, and makes the hardware function as a single giant pool.  Many of the management tasks are handled quite well outside of Oracle’s domain.

By the way, none of those features can be found in Oracle’s hypervisor.  Why would Oracle want any functionality in a hypervisor that’s open source?

And VMware brings a few very cool features to the table that Oracle doesn’t, like real fault tolerance.  Or Dynamic Power Management.  Or Site Recovery Manager.  The list goes on and on.

Nicer.

Not that anyone I know would ever want their Oracle databases to run fully fault tolerant on industry-standard hardware :-)

And wouldn’t it be very surprising if — for some workloads — customers saw far more performance and throughput from the VMware / Oracle SE database config as compared to the much more pricey Oracle RAC configuration?

Maybe Oracle could fight it out with VMware toe-to-toe on the finer points of performance, functionality, etc. — but why bother? 

So much easier to create the impression that Oracle doesn’t support VMware, and move on.

Larry Wants To Own The Stack

Some of the more interesting statements made by Larry Ellison and his team as part of the Sun announcement point to their vision that Oracle could now provide a complete solution “from database to disk”.

Now, if that’s Oracle’s strategic goal, it would be very inconvenient indeed if customers preferred to break up that nice stack with a cloud operating system from VMware, wouldn’t it?

To spend all that money on Sun, and not be able to “close the walls of the garden” so to speak — well, that just wouldn’t do in the grand scheme of things, would it?

I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but when IT vendor strategy guys get together, they talk about emerging stacks, control points, where you want to be open and where you don’t, where you monetize and where you commoditize, and so on.

Not to share deep industry secrets here, but it’s a very common strategic framework for how IT vendors think about assembling their portfolios.

And having VMware inconveniently show up in the Oracle’s new stack with all these radical capabilities just isn’t a good thing for Oracle’s implied strategy with Sun.

Put differently, if you’re Oracle, you don’t want a really big and important strategic control point in your stack being owned by someone else. 

That’s a bad scenario for Oracle.  However, that’s a very good scenario for customers…

As both Sakac and Hollis used their personal blog this cannot be considered the EMC official position, but still the role, visibility and credibility of both executives is so high that their words can’t be taken as just the rant of an average blogger.
The fact that VMware is spreading their posts through its huge community using Twitter confirms that Sakac and Holly’s personal positions are pretty much echoing the official sentiment at VMware and EMC.

The big question now is not what Oracle will answer to that, but why EMC is reacting so strong in public only today.
Is EMC already seeing Oracle-Sun as a dangerous competitor?
Or is this an attempt to drive more sales to VMware now that the company expects its first negative quarter revenue?
Or is this the indirect answer to the recent critics that Oracle expressed against VMware about its virtual appliance strategy?
In any case it’s hard to believe that it’s just a coincidence.

Considering the current state of the global economy, the customers may want to use this
opportunity to ask for an official answer. It may appear on the new Oracle virtualization blog, where the company started its indirect skirmish with VMware a few weeks ago.
For sure it’s unlikely that the answer will be pleasing. Larry Ellison, the Oracle CEO, made it very clear in the Sun acquisition announcement:

Oracle will be the only company that can engineer an integrated system – applications to disk – where all the pieces fit and work together so customers do not have to do it themselves. Our customers benefit as their systems integration costs go down while system performance, reliability and security go up.

It’s easy to guess that Oracle will do everything possible to keep its customers on its brand new full computing stack.

Update: The remarkable number of comments generated by this article led to a follow-up which addresses several questions and misconceptions about the Oracle products and support policy.
The new article is here and it’s highly recommended that you read it.


Labels: , ,

blog comments powered by Disqus


virtualization.info Newest articles
Microsoft announces next version of Windows Server and System Center – UPDATED

October 1st, 2014

Yesterday, Microsoft announced the new name for its Client Operating System: Windows 10. What was also announced was the upcoming features to be introduced in the next version of Windows…

VMware announces Workstation 11 and Player 7 Pro

October 1st, 2014

VMware today announced the release of its type-2 client hypervisor product Workstation (version 11) and Player Pro (version 7). VMware expects to release both products in December this year. Starting…

Release: Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.6

September 30th, 2014

As announced in august, Citrix has now made available version 7.6 of its Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) product XenDesktop and desktop and virtualization product XenApp.
Version 7.6 contains the following…

Lenovo closes acquisition of IBM’s x86 Server Business

September 29th, 2014

While the fact that Lenovo would take over the x86 Server Business line from IBM isn’t new, today Lenovo announced that a definitive agreement has been made effective October 1st….

Release: Pivotal CF 1.3

September 29th, 2014

The Pivotal Initiative is the organization, born in December 2012 from the merge of EMC and VMware cloud application and big data offerings and well known for Pivotal CF…

Paper: IBM Flex System Solution for Microsoft Hyper-V (2-node) Reference Architecture

September 29th, 2014

IBM has released a paper titled: "IBM Flex System Solution for Microsoft Hyper-V (2-node) Reference Architecture". The paper which contains 50 pages describes a reference architecture for building a 2…

Book: Virtualization 2.0 for dummies

September 29th, 2014

VMware has released a free eBook titled: "Virtualization 2.0 for dummies". The book which contains 88 pages can be downloaded from the VMware website after registration.
The book covers the…

Paper: VMware Virtual SAN Performance with Microsoft SQL Server

September 29th, 2014

VMware has released a paper titled:"VMware Virtual SAN Performance with Microsoft SQL Server", the paper which contains 9 pages shows the result of a scalability study running Microsoft SQL Server…

Release: Oracle OpenStack for Oracle Linux (O3L) 1.0

September 25th, 2014

Oracle has released its Oracle OpenStack for Oracle Linux (O3L). Oracle OpenStack for Oracle Linux is a distribution of the OpenStack (Icehouse) cloud framework integrated with the Oracle Linux Operating…

Paper: VMware Horizon 6 Reference Architecture

September 24th, 2014

VMware has released a paper titled: "VMware Horizon 6 Reference Architecture". The paper which contains 53 pages describes a reference architecture for building a VMware Horizon 6 deployment supporting 2,000…

Microsoft releases new Azure Virtual Machine sizes

September 24th, 2014

Microsoft has released new VM sizes for Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines and Web/Worker roles. The new VM sizes are called D-Series offering up to 112 GB in memory with compute…

Citrix releases tech preview of XenDesktop Windows Azure Pack Gallery Image

September 24th, 2014

Citrix has released a technical preview of a Gallery Image containing XenDesktop 7.5 to be used within Microsofts Windows Azure Pack (WAP).
WAP emulates the Windows Azure experience on-premise so…

Oracle Board of Directors appoints ex CEO Larry Ellison as Executive Chairman and CTO

September 23rd, 2014

Oracle has caused a world wide earthquake with the latest news announcing a change in its management, Larry Ellison, one of the founders of the Oracle empire who remained the…

Red Hat acquires FeedHenry

September 19th, 2014

We are living in a mobile world and the future will be more wireless than ever, we are working with technology all the time using our smartphones and tablets, the…

 
Monthly Archive