Citrix XenDesktop ICA vs XenApp ICA

Posted by Staff   |   Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008   |  

citrix logo

In May Citrix released its first fully-featured VDI platform combining together a hypervisor, XenServer, a connection broker, Desktop Deliver Controller (DDC), an OS streaming solution, Provisioning Server, its blockbuster presentation/application virtualization & streaming plaform, XenApp (formerly Presentation Server) and a bunch of other applications.

Only the most skilled Citrix customers know that this rich suite, called XenDesktop, has a limitation: the remote desktop protocol it uses (internally called PortICA) it’s not exactly the same ICA that powers XenApp.

The reason behind this difference is that the ICA protocol is built on top of the Microsoft Terminal Server platform that is missing in the Windows XP and Vista guest operating systems that populate VDI environments.

Citrix has rebuilt many of the features in the new PortICA and it’s working to have the same feature-set across the two protocols. But for now there’s a gap.
Martin Maierhofer, Product Architect at Citrix, details the missing capabilities on his corporate blog:

  • Kerberos SSPI: while a useful feature, this integrates deeply with the logon process, and this is one area where – you guessed it – XenApp and XenDesktop differ considerably. Moreover, for it to be really useful you will typically have to mark the computer that your end users connect to as “trusted for delegation” – and typically . While that may be ok for a relatively small number of well managed XenApp server, it’s less clear that you’d want to do this for thousands of virtual desktops, where your users may have full admin rights. Morever, Windows XP doesn’t support constrained delegation, which makes this a less attractive solution. Hence we decided to leave this aside for the initial release.
  • SmartCards: this is a very important feature for a relatively small, but vocal target market. Again, from a technical point of view it is far from a straight port from XenApp. Having said that, it is a high priority item and we are working on delivering it as soon as possible.
  • SpeedScreen: SpeedScreen is a term that refers to a large array of technologies that optimize the end user experience. The first version of XenDesktop shipped with support for the majority of SS features, including SS Browser Acceleration, SS Flash Acceleration, SS Image Acceleration, and SS Progressive Display. Now for the features that didn’t make the cut: SS Multimedia Acceleration was unfortunately too late to make it into the first release, but we are well under way with it now. The situation is less clear with SS Zero Latency – XenDesktop already supports mouse click feedback, but keyboard type-ahead is a technology that is not terribly easy to set up, and can be tricky to get working with more recent applications that you would typically find on a virtual desktop. For now, we are assessing how we can best make this functionality available on XenDesktop.
  • PDA Sync and Twain: again, these are fairly tied to the Terminal Services infrastructure on XenApp. Moreover, virtually all PDAs and scanners nowadays are USB devices, and we will tackle them in a more compatible and user-friendly manner through our upcoming USB remoting technology in XenDesktop.
  • Shadowing: as I mentioned before, on XenApp this is based off Terminal Services capabilities that just aren’t available to us in XenDesktop. XenDesktop Platinum comes with Citrix GotoAssist, which is a more than capable replacement for shadowing, or you can also use the built-in Remote Assistance feature built into Windows for a premise-based solution. We also have plans to support shadowing functionality in future.
  • SmartAuditor: SmartAuditor is used by a relatively small customer segment, and thus wasn’t among the highest priority items for a first XenDesktop release. There has been quite a lot of prep work for this already, and I am confident that we’ll include this in one of the future XenDesktop releases.
  • Audio on Vista: this is a bit tricky – Vista’s audio architecture differs fundamentally from that used in Windows XP, and we need to completely re-implement the audio framework in PortICA to support Vista, which unfortunately has taken a bit longer than we’d hoped, but is nearing completion now. The good news is that we will be able to take advantage of this rework to integrate much better audio codecs in future.
  • Perfmon Counters and User Experience Metrics: again lack of support for these metrics was due to resource constraints, and there are only minor technical difficulties to make them available on XenDesktop.

Labels: ,

blog comments powered by Disqus Newest articles
Release: VMware vRealize Log Insight 4.5

June 13th, 2017

Log Insight is a log aggregation, management and analysis tool, that VMware first introduced in 2013 and considered a competitor of Splunk.
Yesterday VMware announced the release of version 4.5, available for…

Release: VMware vRealize Automation 7.3

June 6th, 2017

Today VMware announced the latest release of its cloud management platform vRealize Automation, former vCloud Automation Center.
VMware vRealize Automation 7.3 release notes can be found at this link.


Paper: Introducing the NSX-T Platform

February 9th, 2017

“We see greater potential strategic opportunity in NSX over the next decade than our franchise product vSphere has had for the past decade.”
said VMware’s CEO Pat Gelsinger talking about…

Paper: VMware vSphere Virtual Machine Encryption Performance

November 22nd, 2016

Encryption of virtual machines is something that has been requested for years by the security community. VMware continued to postpone its implementation due to the negative operational impact that many…

Quest Software leaves Dell

November 1st, 2016

In September 2012 Dell announced to have completed the acquisition of Quest Software, a Californian company with an history in systems management, security, business intelligence and, falling back in our…

Citrix announces Q3 2016 results

October 21st, 2016

Citrix announced its financial results for third quarter 2016.
The revenues for the second quarter were $841 million for an increase of 3% compared to Q3 2015.
Net income was $132…

Release: VMware vSphere 6.5 & Virtual SAN 6.5

October 19th, 2016

2016 edition of VMworld US has been quite turbulent, on the other hand during VMworld Europe, happening these days in Barcelona, the company announced a few more products for the…

Release: VMware vRealize Log Insight 4.0

October 18th, 2016

Log Insight is a log aggregation, management and analisys tool, that VMware first introduced in 2013 and now is usually compared with Splunk.
Yesterday VMware announced Log Insight’s new major…

Release: Windows Server 2016 with support for Window Server & Hyper-V containers

October 13th, 2016

Yesterday Microsoft announced the general availability of Windows Server 2016 which the company defines as a cloud-ready OS.
Beside fancy definitions, one of the most relevant perks of this release…

Release: Oracle VM 3.4.2

September 22nd, 2016

During Oracle OpenWorld 2016 the company released version 3.4.2 of its enterprise virtualization solution.
Oracle VM is available for both x86 and SPARC based processor architectures and uses the Xen hypervisor…

VMworld US 2016 Wrap-up

September 1st, 2016

Today was the last day of VMware’s flagship conference VMworld in Las Vegas, an highly controversial edition which left a good chunk of the audience disoriented if not properly disappointed….

Gartner releases its Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure as a Service for 2016

August 11th, 2016

Last week Gartner updated its Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) for the year 2016. The Magic Quadrant for the year 2015 was released in May last year…

Release: Ansible Tower 3 by Red Hat

August 2nd, 2016

Ansible is one of the four main players in the automation market, younger then the well known Chef and Puppet, has been launched in 2013 in Durham, N.C. and acquired…

IBM announces earnings for Q2 2016

July 19th, 2016

Yesterday IBM announced its results for Q2 2016.

If we compare with the same quarter in 2015 earnings per share, from continuing operations, decreased 22%. Net income, from continuing operations,…

Monthly Archive