As virtualization.info reported many times in the last couple of years, the current effort to bring security into the virtual infrastructure leaves much to desire.
The best thing that new and consolidated security vendors can do at the moment is:
- moving traditional tools like firewalls, IDS, anti-virus and so on into virtual machines
- ask the virtual infrastructure administrator to reconfigure the virtual network so that virtual traffic pass through or pass by the virtualized security tools above
- offer support for this uncommon new deployment
and all of them are bad things:
#1 is highly inefficient because the admin has to deploy multiple copies of the same tool (it depends on the virtual networking actually, but think about the anti-virus agent in a VDI environment as the worst case) when he could just deploy one that monitors the entire virtual infrastructure at the hypervisor level. And this wastes physical resources big time.
Unfortunately, until VMware releases its VMsafe APIs (and other vendors follow the trend), there’s not much that can be done.
#2 is highly constraining because it breaks the premise of mobility that virtualization brings. As soon as the administrator invokes a live migration for the protected virtual machine, the virtual networking is messed up and the virtualized security tool could be cut out of the game.
VMware is working to mitigate this issue and VI 4.0 will introduce a thing called vNetwork Distributed Switch, preserving the same virtual network configuration even during a live migration.
The technology is interesting but it certainly is just a partial solution of the problem.
#3 is highly unreliable because no matter how committed the vendor is, it will never be able to forecast how many virtual machines are running at the same time on the same virtualization host, and how this will impact on the performance of its virtualized product.
The just released OVF standard allows to define specific characteristics for each virtual machine through a metadata layer, including service level agreements (SLAs), but we are far away from mainstream adoption.
A possible solution (not fully detailed) could be:
- wrapping each virtual machine in a security layer (something that products like VMware ACE, Kidaro Workspaces and Sentillion vThere already do since a while) where the administrator define a specific security policy
- having an independent tier (the virtualization management layer doesn’t seem a good candidate) that acts as security coordinator, reading the policy requirements for each VM security wrapper and querying the hypervisor to see if it has any security product connected that can satisfy the requirements
- having multiple security products that plug into the hypervisor and wait for the a call to action solicited by the security coordinator
Now Altor Networks has just announced what they call Virtual Firewall, which on paper seems to introduce part of the architecture above.
Unfortunately a careful analysis of the most technical brochure available online raises some doubts:
…The Altor VF installs as a virtual appliance on each virtualization host and inspects all traffic to and from each VM guest. Admins use a web-based management console to define and centrally manage traditional firewall rules: allowed and rejected sources, destinations, and protocols; actions to take; etc. Rules can apply to all VMs, a group of VMs with similar connectivity and security needs (such as web servers), or a single VM. Policies built with these rules can also be enforced at the global, group, and per-VM levels…
It really seems that this product, just like any other, requires virtual network reconfiguration (it doesn’t matter if the process is automated by a helpful setup that interacts with VirtualCenter) and that it simply replicates the security policy from one virtual appliance deployed into a virtualization host to another, deployed into a second virtualization host.
In this way the company can claim that virtual machines are protected even during live migrations:
The virtual firewall is “attached” to a VM at all times and travels with it during a VMotion event. This assures continuous security policy enforcement before, during, and after every live migration. Just as importantly, the Altor solution maintains the connected states of all applications within the migrating VM.
Has Altor Networks really found a way to create a security wrapper around ESX virtual machines?
blog comments powered by Disqus
virtualization.info Newest articles
November 20th, 2014
Microsoft has published a series of blog articles called the "Microsoft Infrastructure as a Service Foundations". The goal of the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) Foundations series is to help enterprise IT…
November 17th, 2014
The Day 2 at AWS re:Invent in Las Vegas saw on stage Verner Vogels, amazon.com CTO, in a keynote mostly focused on devs.
Two the key announcements:
Amazon EC2 Container…
November 13th, 2014
Yesterday at AWS re:Invent 2014 in Las Vegas, Andy Jassy (SVP, Amazon Web Services) announced, as expected, a set of new products and services that will be available to Amazon’s…
November 12th, 2014
Veeam today announced the release of version 8 of its Availability Suite. It combines the Veeam Backup & Replication version 8 product together with Veeam ONE version 8, where Backup…
November 12th, 2014
Puppet Labs has released version 3.7 of its Puppet Enterprise. Puppet Enterprise is a Configuration Management platform using a model based, declarative approach build on top of Puppet which…
November 4th, 2014
Midokura is a Japanese startup that released, back in 2013, MidoNet a network virtualization solution for OpenStack.
Yesterday, at OpenStack Summit in Paris, the company announced the decision to…
November 3rd, 2014
Red Hat today announced the release of version 5 of its systems management solution for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) private clouds based on the OpenStack platform, supporting OpenStack, Amazon…
October 30th, 2014
Amazon has released the AWS System Manager for Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM). AWS System Manager is an add-in for SCVMM which allows customers to monitor and manager…
October 29th, 2014
Project VRC, an ititiative started by LogIn Consultants and PQR, has released a new Project Virtual Reality Check (VRC) whitepaper titled:”Phase VII – Impact of Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) 5.0,…
October 28th, 2014
Microsoft has released Update Rollup (UR) 4 for its System Center Suite of products. The update rollup can be installed on top of System Center 2012 R2 products and is…
October 28th, 2014
This week Microsoft is holding its annual TechEd Europe conference in Barcelona Spain. During the keynote which was held today Microsoft made several announcements. This posts gives an overview of…
October 28th, 2014
Zerto, provider of Zerto Virtual Replication (ZVR) has announced that its product will also support the Hyper-V virtualization platform from Microsoft. Virtual Replication does per VM replication and recovery…
October 28th, 2014
Microsoft has released a paper titled:”Windows Server Technical Preview Step-by-Step Guide: Storage Quality of Service“. The paper which contains 16 pages covers a new Windows Server technology which became available…
October 27th, 2014
VMware has released a paper titled: “VMware vCloud Automation Center 6.1 – Reference Architecture“.
The paper which contains 35 pages provide a reference architecture for setting up vCloud Automation Center…