A per-VM firewall would be great if properly executed

Posted by virtualization.info Staff   |   Thursday, October 16th, 2008   |  

As virtualization.info reported many times in the last couple of years, the current effort to bring security into the virtual infrastructure leaves much to desire.

The best thing that new and consolidated security vendors can do at the moment is:

  1. moving traditional tools like firewalls, IDS, anti-virus and so on into virtual machines
  2. ask the virtual infrastructure administrator to reconfigure the virtual network so that virtual traffic pass through or pass by the virtualized security tools above
  3. offer support for this uncommon new deployment

and all of them are bad things:

#1 is highly inefficient because the admin has to deploy multiple copies of the same tool (it depends on the virtual networking actually, but think about the anti-virus agent in a VDI environment as the worst case) when he could just deploy one that monitors the entire virtual infrastructure at the hypervisor level. And this wastes physical resources big time.

Unfortunately, until VMware releases its VMsafe APIs (and other vendors follow the trend), there’s not much that can be done.

#2 is highly constraining because it breaks the premise of mobility that virtualization brings. As soon as the administrator invokes a live migration for the protected virtual machine, the virtual networking is messed up and the virtualized security tool could be cut out of the game.

VMware is working to mitigate this issue and VI 4.0 will introduce a thing called vNetwork Distributed Switch, preserving the same virtual network configuration even during a live migration.
The technology is interesting but it certainly is just a partial solution of the problem.

#3 is highly unreliable because no matter how committed the vendor is, it will never be able to forecast how many virtual machines are running at the same time on the same virtualization host, and how this will impact on the performance of its virtualized product.

The just released OVF standard allows to define specific characteristics for each virtual machine through a metadata layer, including service level agreements (SLAs), but we are far away from mainstream adoption.

 

A possible solution (not fully detailed) could be:

  • wrapping each virtual machine in a security layer (something that products like VMware ACE, Kidaro Workspaces and Sentillion vThere already do since a while) where the administrator define a specific security policy
  • having an independent tier (the virtualization management layer doesn’t seem a good candidate) that acts as security coordinator, reading the policy requirements for each VM security wrapper and querying the hypervisor to see if it has any security product connected that can satisfy the requirements
  • having multiple security products that plug into the hypervisor and wait for the a call to action solicited by the security coordinator

Now Altor Networks has just announced what they call Virtual Firewall, which on paper seems to introduce part of the architecture above.

Unfortunately a careful analysis of the most technical brochure available online raises some doubts:

…The Altor VF installs as a virtual appliance on each virtualization host and inspects all traffic to and from each VM guest. Admins use a web-based management console to define and centrally manage traditional firewall rules: allowed and rejected sources, destinations, and protocols; actions to take; etc. Rules can apply to all VMs, a group of VMs with similar connectivity and security needs (such as web servers), or a single VM. Policies built with these rules can also be enforced at the global, group, and per-VM levels…

It really seems that this product, just like any other, requires virtual network reconfiguration (it doesn’t matter if the process is automated by a helpful setup that interacts with VirtualCenter) and that it simply replicates the security policy from one virtual appliance deployed into a virtualization host to another, deployed into a second virtualization host.
In this way the company can claim that virtual machines are protected even during live migrations:

The virtual firewall is “attached” to a VM at all times and travels with it during a VMotion event. This assures continuous security policy enforcement before, during, and after every live migration. Just as importantly, the Altor solution maintains the connected states of all applications within the migrating VM.

Has Altor Networks really found a way to create a security wrapper around ESX virtual machines?



blog comments powered by Disqus


virtualization.info Newest articles
VMware announcements from its annual VMworld US conference

September 2nd, 2015

During its annual VMworld conference held between August 30 and September 3 in San Fransicso VMware made several announcements. During the keynote on Monday several data center related announcements and…

Release: VMware Workstation 12 Pro, Player 12, Fusion 8 and Fusion Pro 8

August 25th, 2015

VMware today released version 12 of its type-2 client hypervisor products for Microsoft Windows: Workstation Pro and Player and version 8 of its client hypervisor products for Mac OSX: Fusion….

Release: Veeam Management Pack v8 for System Center

August 25th, 2015

Veeam today released version 8.0 of its Management Pack for Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM or OpsMgr). Using this Management Pack customers running Operations Manager to monitor vSphere and…

Release: Oracle VM VirtualBox 5.0

August 24th, 2015

Oracle has released version 5.0 of its type-2 virtualization platform VM VirtualBox. Starting with a public beta in April this year and some more test builds and a release candidate…

Microsoft releases 3rd technical preview of Windows Server 2016 and System Center 2016

August 19th, 2015

Microsoft today announced the release of the 3rd technical preview of the next version of its Server Operating System (Windows Server 2016 TP3) and corresponding management software (System Center…

From VirtualizationMatrix comes WhatMatrix – UPDATED

August 19th, 2015

We quoted several times Virtualization Matrix, the website created to compare the capabilities of the various virtualization platforms on the market such VMware, Microsoft and Citrix.
This idea sparked…

Release: Linux Integration Services Version 4.0 for Hyper-V

August 18th, 2015

Microsoft has released version 4.0. of its Integration Services for Linux. Hyper-V supports both emulated (“legacy”) and Hyper-V-specific (“synthetic”) devices for Linux virtual machines. When a Linux virtual machine…

Release: Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack 2015

August 18th, 2015

Microsoft has released version 2015 of its Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP), which is available as a paid add-on for Microsoft Customers with Software Assurance. In the 2015 release, the…

Release: Microsoft Deployment Toolkit 2013 Update 1

August 18th, 2015

Microsoft has released version 2013 Update 1 of its Deployment Toolkit. The Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) is a toolset for automating desktop and server operating system deployments. MDT 2013…

Release: Parallels Access 3.0 with Apple Watch Support Capabilities

August 6th, 2015

On August 5, Parallels announced that it has released an update to Parallels Access app for remote access. The American virtualization technology company has added file sharing support to its…

Citrix CEO Mark Templeton plans to retire

July 30th, 2015

On July 28 Citrix disclosed that Mark Templeton, the company CEO, has plans to retire after over 20 years of service, an unexpected news that drew attention on the next…

Citrix announces Q2 2015 results

July 30th, 2015

Citrix announced its financial results for second quarter 2015.
The revenues for the second quarter were $797 million for an increase of 2% compared to Q2 2014.
Net income was $103…

VMware announces results for Q2 2015

July 24th, 2015

VMware released the results about its results for Q2 2015.
VMware, announced a GAAP total revenue growth of $1.52 billion, for an increase of 4 percent compared to Q2 2014. License revenues…

Gartner releases its 2015 Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure

July 21st, 2015

Gartner released its Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure for year 2015, once more positioning VMware and Microsoft in the leaders Quadrant.
No surprises in the leaders quadrant, as…

 
Monthly Archive